This bold admission marks a significant departure from the regime’s typical denials and proxies’ operations, demonstrating a clear assertion of their so-called “hard revenge” promise.
The aftermath of these attacks has been met with widespread condemnation. The Iraqi Prime Minister condemned the strikes as a “hostile act,” while Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein criticized Iran for exporting its internal crises. The international community, including the UN representative in Iraq, Matthew Miller, the spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, and the UK Ambassador to Iraq, has also voiced strong opposition.
In Kurdistan, leaders like Masrour and Masoud Barzani have expressed their concerns and intentions to seek international intervention. This is indicative of the growing unrest and opposition against Iran’s aggressive actions in the region.
The controversy further deepens with revelations from Gholamreza Qasemian, head of Iran’s Parliamentary Documents Center. He disclosed that a previous missile attack on an American base in Iraq was a fabricated operation, undermining the regime’s credibility. This confession exposes a pattern of deceit and manipulation by the Iranian regime in its military operations.
On behalf of the Iranian Resistance, I vehemently condemn the clerical regime’s attacks and aggression. Once more, I urge the @UN Security Council to castigate this regime and place it under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. #Iran pic.twitter.com/I2O9z24Yg7
— Maryam Rajavi (@Maryam_Rajavi) January 16, 2024
The situation is further complicated by Iran’s internal dynamics. The admission of fabricating previous military actions, coupled with the recent bold missile attacks, reflects the regime’s desperation to maintain its grip on power amidst growing internal and external pressures.
Critics, including Iranian opposition President-elect Maryam Rajavi of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), are calling for punitive actions under Article 7 of the United Nations Charter. This highlights the international community’s growing impatience with Iran’s provocative actions and its disregard for regional stability.
Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, initially vowed “harsh revenge” following the killing of Qasem Soleimani, a key figure in the regime. However, the subsequent actions, including the recent attacks and the fabrication of previous operations, suggest a regime struggling to balance its domestic narrative of power with the realities of international relations and its diminished credibility.
The internal turmoil within Iran is also manifesting in demands for accountability from various factions, including student groups. This internal dissent is a critical factor in understanding the regime’s recent actions, as it attempts to assert its strength externally while grappling with growing internal challenges.
#Iran News in Brief
Reacting on the assassination of Razi Mousavi, a high-ranking #IRGC member in Syria, Ramezan Sharif, the IRGC spox declared that the #October7 attacks were conducted in retaliation for the killing of Qasem Soleimani by the United States and Israel.
1/ pic.twitter.com/1s22qjGcc2— NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) December 27, 2023
In conclusion, Iran’s recent missile attacks and the regime’s admission of responsibility represent a critical juncture in the Middle East’s geopolitical landscape. The regime’s attempts to project power and divert attention from internal crises have only resulted in heightened international scrutiny and condemnation. This development raises significant questions about the future of Iran’s domestic and foreign policy, and its impact on regional stability.
MEK Iran (follow us on Twitter and Facebook), Maryam Rajavi’s on her site, Twitter & Facebook, NCRI (Twitter & Facebook), and People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran – MEK IRAN – YouTu
