Ever since Iranâ€™s nuclear issue has been handed to the United Nations Security Council for punitive actions, crisis in the region has been flaring up at periods, each time the case is opened or closed for review.
Crisis in Lebanon, the hostage-taking of British sailors, and nowadays the explosions at the holy sites in Iraq and the wave of terror and war in Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon, all carry embedded messages from Tehran.
Last year on August 22, Keyhan, a state-run daily published in Tehran wrote â€œThe Iranian dossier will not be resolved at the negotiating table unless when the other party comes to realize that the cost of engaging Iran is so high that the bitterness of compromise will be considered justifiable.â€ The paper continues, â€œThe West will only give in to the emergence of a nuclear Iran when it is left with no other choice.â€
â€œIranâ€™s regional power is so much that it has the ability to confront matters from a strong stance. Iranâ€™s dossier will not be resolved at the negotiating table but it will be resolved in the streets of Beirut and Baghdad,â€ suggested Keyhan daily.
Of course what the daily is referring to as â€œIranâ€™s regional powerâ€ and â€œstrong stanceâ€ refers mainly to Tehranâ€™s ability to fuel murder and crisis in Baghdad, Beirut, and Gaza Strip.
The strategy of â€œcreating crisis in the regionâ€ and â€œnegotiate in the Westâ€ is what the Iranian mullahs believe will lead them into stability and gaining hegemony in the region which would help them realize their longtime dream of an Islamic Empire. The negotiations will help Tehran buy time while crisis will keep West on its toes.
The above strategy, though devised cleverly, has its flaws.
The West will not accept mullahsâ€™ hegemony in the region and as the leaders have clearly and repeatedly stated, they â€œwill not accept a nuclear Iran.â€ Consequently the cycle of â€œviolence â€“ negotiationsâ€ can not be a never-ending loop and sooner or later will have to come to a conclusion and when it does, it will be payback time for the mullahs.
The mullahsâ€™ on the other hand, foreseeing a very dangerous turn ahead, are trying to portray their aggressive warmongering policy in the region as a sign of their strength deterring any serious action against them. But the fact of the matter is that if there was any strength left in this regime, it would have used it to immediately make a U-turn and prevent the obvious upcoming head to head clash with the West. Let us not forget that there is still time for Iran to prevent another UN Security Council resolution. But a regime as fragile as the mullahsâ€™ can not withstand such maneuvers and as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranâ€™s hard-line president, has said repeatedly, â€œThe Iranian nuclear program, is a train with no brakes and no reverse.â€