The 1950s and 1960s were a period of turbulence and repression in Iran. In 1953, Iranian monarch Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi staged a coup against the popular Prime Minister Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh and seized control of the country. He then used his secret police, the Savak, to silence all opposition groups.
It was in this era of oppression that Mohammad Hanifnejad, Saeid Mohsen, and Ali Asghar Badizadegan founded the group that would later become the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) aka Mujahedin-e Khalq, the oldest and largest resistance movement in Iran. On September 6, 1965, these three Iranian intellectuals set out on a journey to bring freedom and democracy to Iran.
The MEK’s founders embraced an interpretation of Islam that rejected fundamentalism and affirmed the rights of all people to express their beliefs. This was the dominant interpretation of Islam in Iran before the authoritarian regimes which limited religious and political freedoms.
The MEK has always felt that the atheist/Muslim conflict promoted by the mullahs was an artificial battle that distracts from the real power struggle in Iran. The founders of the MEK understood that the real conflict was not between those of different faiths but between the oppressed and the oppressors.
These ideas were unprecedented in the history of Iran, and the founders’ commitment to stay true to their values set the MEK on a course that would pit them against two dictatorships and cost them more than 100,000 lives. Through their determination and sacrifice, the MEK has become admired around the world for its long fight for freedom and democracy.
1965-1969: The Early Days of the MEK
During the first few years of the MEK’s existence, its founders focused on laying the groundwork for the movement’s future growth and success. They recruited new members and established leaders within the group to build strong networks of supporters. The MEK’s founders were firmly committed to the idea that the struggle for freedom is a science that requires study to be acquired, so they painstakingly researched all philosophical doctrines that could help them succeed where previous movements had failed. After an exhaustive study, Hanifnejad and his co-founders decided that democratic Islam was the ideology best suited to the aspirations of the Iranian people.
The MEK’s founders also agreed that the struggle for freedom and democracy is a full-time job that cannot be achieved in one’s free time. With this in mind, they recruited members who were willing to devote every waking hour to the advancement of the MEK’s goals. Unsurprisingly, the first people to join the new movement were university students and young intellectuals. One such young student was Massoud Rajavi, a man who would go on to take a pivotal role in shaping the MEK’s future.
1971: Crackdown and Executions
By the winter of 1969, the MEK had a philosophy, a goal, and a network of members, and they set out to form a network of activists to actively oppose the Shah’s regime.
This posed a threat to the Shah. In August of 1971, the Shah’s monarchy was nearing the highly-publicized celebration of its rule. Several heads of state were scheduled to attend the festivities, and the monarchic dictatorship was worried that opposition to the event might prove embarrassing or problematic, so the Shah ordered a widespread crackdown on all individuals and groups who opposed his regime.
The Savak arrested and imprisoned more than 80% of the MEK’s members and all of its leaders. Although the crackdown hit the young organization, the resulting trials made the MEK famous in Iran. The MEK’s leaders were defiant in the Shah’s military courts and gained massive popularity among the masses for exposing the regime’s corruption.
Stories of the MEK’s resistance in the Shah’s courts and prisons soon spread throughout Iran by word of mouth, and the group expanded its base of support to encompass Iranians from every sector of society.
Mohammad Hanifnejad had been sentenced to death, but the Savak, in an attempt to minimize the threat posed by the MEK, offered to spare his life if he publicly disavowed his work with the MEK. He and the other founders of the MEK refused to compromise their beliefs, even though it meant sacrificing their lives. On May 25, 1972, Mohammad Hanifnejad, Saeid Mohsen, and Ali Asghar Badizadegan were executed by the Shah’s regime.
Massoud Rajavi was the only surviving leader of the MEK after the Shah’s purge in 1975, thanks to an international campaign to save his life spearheaded by his brother, Kazem Rajavi. Kazem, a respected lawyer and politician in Switzerland, gathered support from several organizations and politicians and convinced them to pressure the Shah to convert Massoud Rajavi’s death sentence to life in prison. One of the politicians involved in the campaign was Francois Mitterrand, the head of the French Socialist Party and future President of France.
1975: A Failed Coup within the MEK
In September 1975, the MEK was left without active leadership due to the Shah’s purge. The only surviving leader, Massoud Rajavi, was serving a life sentence in prison. A separatist Maoist group seized upon this opportunity to try to wrest control of the MEK and change its ideology.
The separatist group was relentless in its goal of taking over the organization and changing its core values and ideals. Those remaining members who stayed loyal to the MEK’s core beliefs were intimidated and oppressed by the separatists. Majid Sharif Vaghefi, one of the most senior members of the MEK outside of prison, was murdered by the separatists because he refused to accept their twisted beliefs.
The Shah’s regime weakened during the late 1970s due to a series of escalating nationwide protests. The absolute power of the monarchy began to weaken as protesters demanded political freedoms and the release of political prisoners.
Massoud Rajavi and the other imprisoned leaders of the MEK were released from prison on January 20, 1979. The MEK then played a key role in organizing the protests that led to the 1979 Revolution. The MEK’s goal in helping the people of Iran to overthrow the Shah was to bring democracy and freedom to Iran. One month later, the monarchy fell, and the mullahs seized control of the country. Because the leaders of the MEK had been imprisoned until just before the Revolution took place, they were powerless to prevent the dawn of the Islamic Republic.
1979-1981: Peaceful Protests against the Mullahs’ Theocratic Dictatorship
The MEK opposed the mullahs’ regime, founded by Ruhollah Khomeini, from the moment it began. The organization warned the Iranian people of the threat posed by the fundamentalist regime, including the repression of women, religious minorities, and opposition groups. The MEK quickly became known as the primary defender of freedom in the country, building a wide base of support among people across Iran. Young people and intellectuals were particularly drawn to the movement, and within two years, the MEK has become the largest political organization in Iran.
Meanwhile, Khomeini’s regime transformed Iran into a religious dictatorship, brutally oppressing women, minorities, and students. 70 members and supporters of the MEK were murdered by Khomeini’s forces during this period while participating in peaceful protests, meetings, rallies against the mullahs’ regime.
On June 20, 1981, the MEK held a demonstration in protest of the trampling of the Iranian people’s fundamental rights and freedoms by Khomeini and the fundamentalist regime. 500,000 people attended the demonstration in Tehran, which was not publicly announced before the event.
This demonstration would prove to be the final mass attempt to resist the new regime. Khomeini dispatched his army, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), to the scene of the demonstration, where they opened fire on the peaceful protesters.
Post-1981: Terror at the Hands of Khomeini’s Regime and the Founding of the NCRI
Just before the June 20th demonstration, Khomeini’s regime launched a crackdown on opposition groups. As the largest and most well-known resistance organization, the MEK was targeted specifically. Some members and supporters of the Mojahedin were executed in the streets, and thousands more were imprisoned, tortured, and then executed. Pregnant women, children, and elderly people were among the 120,000 MEK members and supporters murdered at the hands of Khomeini’s brutal regime.
Under the fatwas issued by Khomeini, the regime’s interrogators and guards were permitted to use any form of torture they could dream up to brutalize the Mojahedin. Torturers severed organs from the bodies of prisoners, gouged out eyes, and raped young girls before executing them. There are accounts of guards drawing blood from condemned MEK members before their executions to use it on their fellow guards and soldiers. Pregnant women were tortured and then executed.
On July 21, 1981, one month after Khomeini began his crackdown, Massoud Rajavi founded the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a coalition of Iranian opposition forces dedicated to replacing Khomeini’s religious dictatorship with a democratic, pluralistic, secular state. One week later, on July 29th, the MEK’s leaders fled Iran with the assistance of courageous officers from the Iranian Air Force. Massoud Rajavi sought refuge in France, where he continued the battle for freedom against the Iranian regime. The MEK and the Iran-Iraq War
In 1980, Iran and Iraq went to war, and the Iraqi army occupied part of Iran. The MEK took up arms to defend Iran, but when the Iraqi army retreated behind international borders, the Mojahedin called for peace, feeling that there was no longer any justification for war between the two countries.
Khomeini, however, refused to end the war until the Iraqi government was overthrown and replaced with a religious tyranny identical to his own. The ongoing war allowed Khomeini to ignore the demands of the Iranian people and to crack down further on opposition groups with claims that they were weakening the government and colluding with foreign enemies.
On September 10, 1982, Massoud Rajavi met with then-Foreign Minister of Iraq Tariq Aziz at the NCRI’s headquarters in Paris and signed a peace agreement with the Iraqi government on behalf of the MEK and the Iranian people. The agreement was proof that peace can be achieved between two opposing sides, and it served to show that the Iranian regime was the cause of the war’s continuation.
The peace agreement drew international attention and was endorsed by 5,000 politicians from 57 countries across the world.
1985: The Rise of Women in the MEK
Following the 1979 Revolution, it became clear that the fight against the mullahs’ regime was of particular importance to the MEK’s women members, and during the next six years, these women showed themselves to be fiercely committed to the cause of freedom. On March 10, 1985, Maryam Azdanlou (Rajavi) became the co-secretary general of the MEK, taking her rightful place in the leadership of the organization.
Today, the majority of the MEK’s leadership is female. The MEK came to recognize early on that the Iranian regime’s primary victims are women, and thus their strongest opponents are also women.
1986: The MEK Relocates to Iraq
On June 7, 1986, Massoud Rajavi left France under pressure from the French government, which was attempting to appease the Iranian regime to preserve its business dealings with the mullahs. Rajavi went to Iraq, where he founded the National Liberation Army (NLA) on June 20, 1987.
The MEK signed a bilateral agreement with the Iraqi government before its relocation stating that it would preserve its independence and that Baghdad would not interfere in the politics or operations of the Iranian Resistance.
The NLA became a major force in fighting the Iranian regime, carrying out hundreds of assaults against Khomeini’s armed forces. The largest of these, “Operation Eternal Light,” took place from July 2 to July 5, 1988, and targeted the entire Iranian regime militarily. The regiment suffered 55,000 casualties in the attack, while the NLA lost 1,304 officers and soldiers.
Middle East analysts and observers credit the Khomeini’s acceptance of the 1988 ceasefire with Iraq to the NLA’s efforts.
1988: The Massacre of MEK Members and Supporters
July 28, 1988, was the beginning of what is known as the 1988 Massacre. Throughout a single summer, the Iranian regime, based on a fatwa issued by Ruhollah Khomeini, executed more than 30,000 political prisoners, most of whom were MEK members or supporters. The mass executions have been called a crime against humanity by numerous human rights organizations and activists, and the perpetrators of this crime have yet to be brought to justice.
Khomeini issued a fatwa in the closing days of the Iran-Iraq War ordering the execution of all political prisoners in Iran who did not renounce their ties to the MEK. He appointed three-member “Death Commissions” to travel to the regime’s prisons and carry out trials that lasted only minutes. Those who refused to renounce the MEK were sent directly to the gallows, where they were hanged in groups and buried in mass graves.
Many of those who were executed had already completed their sentences and were awaiting release when they were called before the Death Commissions. Teenagers, pregnant women, and elderly people were among the victims. Bodies were not returned to the families of the victims, and many families never received notification of their loved ones’ fates or whereabouts.
The barbarity of the 1988 Massacre was enough to create conflict between regime leaders at the highest levels. During the massacre, Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, then the heir-apparent to Khomeini, write a letter to the Supreme Leader protesting the decision to execute so many people in such a short amount of time. Khomeini responded to his letter by deposing the once-favored mullah and forcing him into house arrest.
After Khomeini died in 1989, then-regime President Ali Khamenei took his place as Supreme Leader. Montazeri remained in house arrest until he died in 2009. A number of the perpetrators of the 1988 Massacre have since gone on to hold positions of power within the Iranian regime, including Minister of Justice and Chief of the Judiciary.
The 1990s and 2000s: The Policy of Appeasement
The 1990s signaled a new era of rapprochement toward the Iranian regime. Western countries hoped that by appeasing the mullahs, they could reap the economic benefits of doing business with the Iranian regime and avoid the threat to global stability they posed. The MEK, as the regime’s largest opposition, paid the price for this failed policy, as did the Iranian people who continued to suffer until the regime’s oppression.
In 1997, the United States designated the MEK as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). The designation was a goodwill gesture to newly-appointed Iranian regime President Mohammad Khatami, who billed himself as a “moderate” and a “reformist.”
In 2002, the European Union followed the U.S. and also designated the MEK as a terrorist organization. The effort by the EU was led by then-U.K. Foreign Minister Jack Straw, a staunch advocate of the appeasement policy toward the Iranian regime. Canada and Australia subsequently added the MEK to their terrorist lists.
The policy of appeasement and terrorist designations led to political and military pressure against the MEK that resulted in the suffering and deaths of many innocent people. Camp Ashraf and Camp Liberty in Iraq suffered numerous bombing and missile attacks before their residents were finally relocated to Albania, and lives were lost in the process.
The Mojahedin was not deterred by these setbacks. Decades of struggle had made the MEK resilient and resourceful. Unwavering in their conviction, they turned to the courts. For more than fifteen years, the MEK waged a legal battle to remove their name from the terrorist lists.
In 2009, the MEK achieved their first legal victory and was delisted in the European Union. In the following years, the United States judiciary declared that the MEK was wrongly designated as a terrorist organization, and in 2012, it was delisted by the U.S. Department of State. Shortly thereafter, Canada and Australia removed the MEK from their terrorist lists.
2016-2018: The MEK’s Relocation to Albania
In 2016, an international effort led by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi completed the relocation of the MEK members still living in Iraq to a new home in Albania. The relocation came after years of missile attacks by the Iranian regime and its Iraqi proxies. The new location allowed the MEK members to focus all of their efforts on fighting for freedom and democracy in Iran instead of fighting off missile attacks. It was also a major blow for the Iranian regime because the mullahs understand that every step forward for the MEK is a step toward the regime’s destruction.
This step toward destruction happened almost immediately. The MEK continued to expand its base of support inside Iran after 2016, while discontent with the regime’s corruption and the overall state of the economy grew. Finally, in December 2017, protests broke out in cities across Iran. Over two weeks, the protests spread to 142 cities in every province in the country. The first protests were mostly about economic concerns and corruption, but within days people were calling for regime change.
Even the regime’s leaders have been forced to acknowledge the MEK’s role in the uprisings and the subsequent ongoing protests. The calls for regime change have not stopped, and protests continue daily in cities across Iran. The long-held dream of the MEK is close at hand, and with the help of the Resistance Units fighting on the ground, the Ashrafis working endlessly in Albania, and MEK members and supporters around the world, Iran will soon be free.
Uprising – Continuing Struggle in Iran
The uprising that started in December 2017 in Iran was a powerful sign of unrest that rattled the religious dictatorship and all its factions. The protests started for seemingly economic grievances but rapidly expanded to widespread and continuous calls for the overthrow of the regime in its entirety. Protesters chanted “Death to Khamenei”, “Death to Rouhani”, and “Reformer, Hardliner, the game is now over”, targeting the entirety of the clerical coalition that rules Iran.
The protests continued throughout 2018 and encompassed workers, farmers, rural communities, teachers, defrauded investors, truckers, environmentalists, and women, and students. The protesters denounced the regime’s foreign policy with “Let go of Syria, think about our condition” and “Our enemy is here, but they lie to us that it’s America.”
International human rights organizations such as Amnesty International estimate about 7,000 arrests by the regime during the uprisings and protests, and the regime itself has admitted to at least 4,600 arrests (Hassan Abbasi, Ofogh State TV, June 1, 2019). The Iranian Resistance has reported that as of January 2019, a more accurate figure is around 8,000 according to internal reporting and research. Security forces killed at least 36 persons during the uprisings, 11 of them under brutal torture in regime detention centers.
The PMOI/MEK’s resistance units have been very active in all cities across Iran, informing and assisting the public on ways to resist the regime. The MEK expanded its “Resistance Units” over the past year. Their activities include torching large billboards of Khamenei and Rouhani in busy districts of Tehran and other cities and destroying regime symbols at Bassij and IRGC centers. They write slogans against the regime, distribute informational leaflets and drape bridges in busy districts of Tehran with huge banners of Mrs. Rajavi. The regime is very alarmed that these activities will encourage the public to further rise against it.
Mahmoud Alavi, Minister of MOIS, admitted on April 19, 2019, that the regime had arrested 116 Resistance Units of the MEK over the past year. This is a clear acknowledgment of the Resistance Units’ progress and activities.
A report by the MOIS in East Azerbaijan province on April 22, 2019, stated, that MEK activities in the province increased from March 2018 to March 2019. The report said, “The MEK exploited economic and social problems to expand its activities last year. Some 60 persons associated with the group were arrested and more than 50 others were identified and warned.”
Fars News Agency, affiliated with IRGC reported on August 5, 2018: “In the turmoil of January 2018, the PMOI identified opportunities and capacities inside the country and formally ordered operations to be launched through Resistance Units. These units consisted of 2 to 5 MEK members.”
State-run Baharestaneh website – August 28, 2018: “Today, the PMOI has infiltrated in all social sectors and are directing them, including truck drivers, bazaar merchants, teachers, and workers.”
State-run Baharestaneh website – August 28, 2018: “The PMOI have formed groups called ‘Resistance Units’ that have the power of replication, and the potential and ability to replace their leaders in the field.”
Eje’I, the spokesperson for the regime’s Judiciary: “Nowadays some people chant slogans against the Judiciary and the authorities. Be careful, God forbid, a PMOI member might come in the people’s midst and people will follow him. We must be careful not to be abused by the PMOI.”
Ghasemi, an IRGC commander – August 7, 2018: “We have a problem, namely the PMOI. We must be careful not to neglect this. They have infiltrated some organizations and IRGC ranks.”
The PMOI/MEK has also organized “popular councils” which have been very active in all cities across Iran, informing and assisting the public on ways to resist the regime. While members of Resistance Units are from the younger generation, members of popular councils are people from all ages and sectors of the population who take part in certain social activities.
These councils have provided advice and opportunities to organize independently for cooperative assistance to stricken compatriots ignored by the corrupt clerical regime. One exemplary campaign was during the disastrous floods that overtook Iran in April, May, and June. PMOI/MEK popular councils gathered material assistance donated in various neighborhoods and trucked and distributed them to stricken areas. People bitterly complaining that the government had done nothing to assist them met the council members with a warm welcome.
The regime faces a dilemma by pretending that the PMOI/MEK has no popular support in Iran, and yet increasingly needing to point out the active presence of PMOI/MEK resistance units and councils to dissuade the public from joining them. This trend has led to increasing news of resistance activities in regime news media in recent months.
Public news of sentences of PMOI/MEK activists has been frequently surfacing in the news media. On May 20, a so-called revolutionary court in Tehran sentenced a 34-year-old PMOI/MEK activist and member of a resistance unit to death and three others to five years in prison for engaging in non-violent dissemination of anti-regime literature.
The PMOI/MEK has announced that the actual figures for arrests and sentences have been much higher. Due to various security concerns and the need for secrecy to protect sources and methods, the PMOI/MEK published a limited list of names recently of 28 detainees in over 13 cities, appealing to international human rights organizations to take urgent action for their release.
In the past 12 months up to June 2019, popular uprisings and protests have swept through 556 cities and towns and industrial centers in Iran, consisting of 1354 workers’ actions in 146 cities.
A brief tally of organized protests and strikes is:
Four rounds of widespread national strikes by truckers in 323 cities
Three rounds of national strikes by teachers in 104 cities from 348 academic institutions
Widespread bazaar (business) strikes in 12 provinces
A 38-day strike and protest marches by the Ahwaz steelworkers union
A 28-day strike and protest marches by the Haft-Tapeh sugar cane workers in Shush
Railroad workers strike in 35 cities protesting unpaid salaries
Municipal workers strike in 60 cities protesting unpaid salaries
PMOI/MEK resistance units and councils with thousands of dedicated members in over 150 cities and towns continue to organize and campaign for regime change in Iran leading to daily protest actions in various cities.
ASHRAF III, RISING From the ASHES: Iranian Opposition Terrifies Tehran Rulers; A European Delegation Report Paperback – February 2019
Introducing a new book by Struan Stevenson
This European delegation report recalls the suffering of several thousand men and women members of the Iranian democratic opposition, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI or MEK). They were living in exile in Camp Ashraf and later Camp Liberty in Iraq. After the withdrawal of the US military, they were left at the mercy of the vicious Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his masters in Tehran. Finally, the tiny country of Albania agreed to provide them with a safe haven in Tirana.
Now the “Ashrafis” have a home and have made friends with the local Albanians. Their fortitude and stamina have acted as a beacon of hope for the 80 million beleaguered citizens of Iran who hope and pray for freedom from oppression and now look to the MEK as the harbingers of the future of democracy, justice, and peace.
The author visited the Iranian opposition center, Ashraf III, with 2 senior Members of the European Parliament, Tunne Kelam & Jaromir Stetina, and spoke with the residents to hear their stories as well as observing the progress they have made in setting up their new home.
The report goes into some detail of the chaos that has engulfed Iran, leading to the first anniversary of the nationwide uprising. It shows how the clerical regime has reacted with brutal force, killing, imprisoning, and intimidating the Iranian population, rather than seeking to resolve the crisis. The report shows how the mullahs have reacted to the threats to their regime by ramping up their sponsorship of international terror and cyberwarfare, as well as a demonization campaign against their main organized opposition.
The report is highly critical of the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs – Federica Mogherini – for her continued attempts to ignore the blatant abuse of human rights that take place in Iran on a daily basis.
Museum 120 years of struggle for freedom in Iran- Ashraf-3 Albania home to members of the MEK
Written by Staff Writer on 20 January 2020.
120 YEARS OF STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM
Explore the Iranian Resistance’s historical exhibition entitled, “120 Years of Struggle for Freedom,” that encapsulates the glorious struggle of Iranians for freedom.
A struggle to break free of the bondage of feudal Shahs and reactionary clerics to enter the modern era of democratic-republican governance. A struggle that has faced innumerable challenges through the past century and even today.
Explore many of the spaces and displays in this museum and learn about the rich history of a heroic effort by Iranians to achieve freedom and progressive society, and the high price that they have paid for it in the tens of thousands of lives laid down for this noble goal.
Shaking the regime in its entirety, the uprising in November quickly erupted in at least 191 cities. Assessments indicate that it was the most important challenge the Iranian regime has ever faced.
The protests were sparked by a gas price hike, however, due to the explosive situation of the society, they dramatically expanded all over the country in just 24 hours. Demanding regime change, Iranian people chanted against the Supreme Leader and the regime in its entirety.
The high volume of the protests forced the regime to dispatch all its suppressive forces, in particular the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), onto the streets, killing people in cold blood.
The Chairman of the Parliament’s National Security Committee Mojtaba Zolnour admitted that there had been harsh clashes between angry protesters and security forces in 800 locations across the country, including147 points just in the capital Tehran.
Senior commanders of the IRGC who had been dispatched to the scenes, later compared the conflicts with the harshest scenes of the Iran-Iraq war saying: “God saved the regime.“
Confronting the bloody suppression, the protesters, mainly from the low sectors of the society, defended themselves, setting fire to some 900 gas-stations, 1000 governmental banks, many governorate buildings, and state seminaries.
In order to cover the dimension of suppression and prevent the expansion of the protests throughout the country, in an unprecedented measure, the Iranian regime shut down the Internet for more than a week.
Relying on its vast social network, the MEK announced the death tollon a daily basis. Based on the MEK’s information, some 1500 protesters were killed, 4000 were injured, and another 12000 were arrested. This death toll was later confirmed by the top officials of the US and Reuters. Reuters referred to three sources in the regime’s Interior Ministry. Iran’s regime not only has notprovided any information about the victims of the Iran protests but has prevented the issue from being raised in public; however, so far the MEK has revealed the names of more than 750 martyrs.
In fear of a new bout of protests and eruption of the society, the regime prevented the families to hold mourning ceremonies for the victims.
The November 2019 uprising happened less than two years after the nationwide uprising in January 2018 that erupted in140 cities across the country. This indicates the deteriorating situation in Iranian society that will result in an end to the mullahs’ rule, the inefficiency of suppression as it was before, and uncontrollable situation for the regime.
Protesting againstthe downing of a Ukrainian airliner by the IRGC, which left 176 people dead in January 2020, once again Iranian people flooded the streets in Tehran and cities of ninety provinces in Iran. This time, college students representing the middle class in Iran were in the front line. The slogans were focused on the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the IRGC that represent the regime in its entirety.
Chanting “down with the tyrants, be it the Shah or the Leader (referring to the Supreme Leader)” and “Neither the crown nor the turban.The mullahs are goners,” protesters showed that the Iranian people see the future in denying the dictatorship in any form and demanding democracy.
Demanding regime change in Iran is the common point of the protests in Iran.
By chanting “Reformists! Hardliners! The GAME IS OVER!” in January 2018 protests, Iranian people disavowed the regime in its entirety. In August 2018, a prominent theoretician of the Iran regime, Saied Hajjarian, said: “If there will be a situation like other democratic countries in Iran, holding transparent elections without interference by the government and taking off the cover of greenery, there would be none of us, neither you nor me, there will be neither hardliners nor reformist.”
Rejecting both the past (monarchy) — and the present (theocracy), Iranian people called for a better and different future in the January 2020 uprising.